Sunday, November 30, 2014

NSAIDs as Potential Anti-Cancer Agents

As we know, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are some of the most commonly used drugs for issues with pain as a result of inflammation. On the other side of the spectrum it should also be noted that NSAIDs have been shown to have adverse effects, such as gastrointestinal pain or peptic ulcer formation during cox-1 inhibition as well as cardiovascular complications during cox-2 inhibition. The point of this blog post is to explore yet another effect that NSAIDs may have on the body: an effect as anti-cancer agents.

One review article I found explains the results of a few studies that support this claim. According to the review, past studies have shown a direct link between long term NSAID usage and a decrease in colorectal polyps, or growths around the colon or rectum. Most of the time these polyps progress towards cancerous growths if left untreated. The NSAIDs work on these growths by stimulating apoptosis of the polyp's cells and inhibiting angiogenesis (the formation of new blood vessels). Inhibiting angiogenesis essentially cuts off the polyp's blood supply limiting the amount of nutrients its receives. The review discusses one specific study in which rats were given subcutaneous injections of a known carcinogen that works in the intestines and then subsequently given a a known concentration of an NSAID at varying points in time after exposure to the carcinogen. Traditional NSAIDS such as Aspirin were used, as well as selective cox-2 inhibitors such as Celecoxib. The results of the study were conclusive in that they showed a significant decline of tumor size in rat models by 40-60%, but did not show an overall elimination of the tumor.

The review went on to state some other interesting findings of the study. Results show that the rats that received NSAID treatment directly after subcutaneous carcinogen injection showed a greater suppression in tumor size compared to rats that received the NSAID treatment later on. This makes sense with what we would expect; if treatment is received closer to the onset of a disease, the individual should have a greater chance of the treatment being successful. Furthermore, the study showed that while traditional NSAID treatment is only effective in the preliminary stages of cancer formation, cox-2 selective inhibitors like refecoxib can be effective at later stages of cancer. The method behind this is misunderstood, and may prove to be a subject of further study. It is also noted that continued NSAID treatment is required to continue polyp suppression, which may cause GI tract/cardiovascular issues over extended periods of time. With all of the various effects that NSAIDs are found to have on the body, it seems as though those who understand the effects are left to make a choice - risk the negative effects of taking NSAIDs for the proven positive effects, or live with some pain and inflammation to decrease the potential for negative effects. I personally believe that moderation is key here, as it is in many cases.



Michael J. Thun, Et al. "Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs as Anti-Cancer Agents: Mechanistic, Pharmacologic, and Clinical Issues." Oxford Journals. 20 Feb. 2002. Web. 30 Nov. 2014.

13 comments:

  1. Michael, I see how you think a moderate treatment is the best option, but personally I believe it is not worth risking cardiovascular/GI tract issues if the threat of cancer is not yet present. Once the polyp develops, then I believe the tables turn and the polyp should be prioritized above the negative effects of NSAIDs. Maybe I'm wrong, but I believe medicine shouldn't be used until necessary.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mario I definitely see what you're saying! NSAIDs such as aspirin and ibuprofen are used very commonly for pain due to inflammation and that was what I meant when I said they're useful in moderation. I also think they could potentially be used as chemoprevention mechanisms under certain circumstances.

      Delete
  2. Thanks for that post Mike! I don't think I would go with regular use of NSAIDs strictly for a preventative measure for that specific form of cancer unless I had history of it in my family. After development of polyps, I would agree with Mario and switch to NSAIDs but it all hinges on detecting the polyps early which would take some luck.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Using NSAIDs as treatment upon detection of the polyps would definitely be a good idea. Individuals that develop these polyps at a young age (usually due to genetic predisposition) show a very high rate of cancer diagnosis in the future.

      Delete
  3. This is a really interesting study that you have discussed. I think it is also really interesting at the end how you discussed that patients need to decide which path to take (which seems to be a double edged sword). Either they take the meds and reduce the cancer, and increase the risk of GI problems, or they can not take the meds and still have the cancer, inflammation, and pain. However, I think that this might be something to research further, it makes me believe that this "double-edged-sword" theory is coming into play with most cancer treatments today. It really just brings home how even though we have Chemo and radiation, they do have a lot of side effects that patients have to take into consideration. Thanks for the thought provoking post!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This post was super interesting! I hadn't heard about this research before. While the risks to the cardiovascular system are a major downside to utilizing this preventative treatment regularly, I do think that this opens doors to more research to help prevent a common form of cancer. On one hand, I do agree with those who have said the risks are too great, but other another I have to consider how many patients are already taking a regular aspirin regimen for cardiovascular health.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'd never heard of the tumor fights properties of these drugs - thanks for the post, Michael. I was especially interested when you mentioned refecoxib as a potential therapeutic agent. I was curious how the dosages for anti-cancer effects would compare to those for analgesic effects. I found this letter to the editor of the International Journal of Cancer with some interesting thoughts on that topic:

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.20109/pdf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. according to the review, normal doses of NSAIDS over an extended period of time could produce these types of anti-cancer effects. Thanks for the extra bit of info nick!

      Delete
  6. The rat experiment mentioned in your article was quite intriguing. Based on our discussions throughout the semester, it seems to be that rats have a better recovery system than we do. So when you were mentioning a carcinogen injection into the rats, I was actually kind of expecting the tumors to be nonexistent and destroyed with the help of the NSAIDS. What a letdown, hahaha. But your article was definitely interesting and it makes me excited for what the future has in store for us in regards to cancer and NSAIDS ^^

    ReplyDelete
  7. The study that you cited sounded like they found some very convincing informations about NSAIDs being preventative for caner. The mechanism makes sense, because one of the common side effects of cancer is chronic inflammation. Although, I do wonder if this experiment would transfer over to humans. I wonder if people our age starting taking a baby aspirin everyday, would be less likely to get cancer. Seeing as the daily taking of aspirin is usually started later on in life, this could be a possible area of interest to see how it effects humans. Although, I do think that the side effects of taking NSAIDs regularly are hard to overlook.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This was very interesting to read. Angiogenesis is a major hallmark of cancer, and by the NSAIDs ability to block this process the tumor does not have as great and ability to get the nutrients it needs to grow. It does seem like more research needs to be done on this in order to start exercising NSAIDs as possible prevention to cancer.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This was great to bring up as many times inflammation is an initial condition of cancer. It was interesting that the study showed NSAIDs stimulating apoptosis and inhibiting angiogenesis since angiogenesis is a major factor contributing to cancer. I found an additional study similar to the one you cited about NSAIDs and colon cancer. The apoptosis that occurs due to the NSAID is different mechanically from the apoptosis that comes from chemo therapy. The chemopreventive activity of the NSAID is due to their COX2 inhibition targeting. Regarding your study, I was hoping that the results would show elimination of the tumor all together, but a 40-60% reduction in tumor size is incredible.

    "Colon cancer prevention by NSAIDs: what is the mechanism of action?" -Ahnen DJ

    ReplyDelete