Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Stem Cells, The Blood Brain Barrier, and the Future

In the article, "Snorting Stem Cells", we reviewed earlier this week, we learned that there was a significant effort in 2009 towards developing a method for delivering stem cells to the brain, notably through "snorting" (for lack of better word). However, as interesting and hopeful as the article was, it failed to address some important questions that were brought up during discussion, such as: "What happens when the blood brain barrier, something designed to keep self and foreign particles, is made more permeable in order to retain a greater proportion of stem cells post-snorting?" And: "What happens once the stem cells reach the brain? Stem cells themselves have no therapeutic ability unless induced to differentiate and mature into potentially beneficial cells, so how do we get them to differentiate?" Obviously, I don't have the answers to these questions, but the purpose of this blog is to facilitate discussion, so let's start with a general overview on the blood brain barrier and stem cell function.

Discovered over 100 years ago by one Paul Ehrlich, the blood brain barrier serves to protect the brain from foreign (antigens, toxins) and self particles (leukocytes, macrophages) in the blood. Ehrlich found that upon administering different dyes through the blood, all major organs would stain, with the exception of the brain. Thus, the idea of a blood brain barrier existing was born. Today, we know that the barrier is primarily mediated by tight junctions and astrocytes. The tight junctions of the barrier are found in capillary endothelial cells, and serve to selectively limit the diffusion of non neural molecules. The astrocytes maintain the barrier through release of certain chemical messengers, and maintain the brain water uptake through aquaporin-4 water channels. Most importantly, however, was the discovery that molecules could make it across the blood brain barrier if they were lipid soluble enough, thus allowing for transport by diffusion. In fact, this is how many psychoactive drugs enter the brain.

Remarkably distinctive from other cells, are stem cells. Characterized by their ability to divide into virtually any cell our body needs, stem cells are pluripotent and non-specialized. There are two types of stem cells currently known: embryonic and adult stem cells. Both retain the basic function of stem cells described above, with greatest difference in location and specificity of division. Embryonic stem cells possess the ability to divide into the three primary germ line layers: the ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm, which in turn divide into the cells that our body is comprised of. Adult stem cells are more rare and limited in their ability to divide-- they are usually found in more tissue/organ specific areas and can only divide into cells respective to their location. For example, hepatic stem cells will only be able to develop into other hepatic cells.

So how does this all relate to the questions posed in class? Well if you remember, in the article they stated that an enzyme was given to increase the permeability of the blood brain barrier. We decided that this was dangerous, since we don't know what else could make it in. Considering that the amount of stem cells that made it into the brain was such a meager amount (500/300,000) to begin with, a 3 fold increase claimed by increasing barrier permeability can be considered negligible. Furthermore, when taking into account the rapid division ability of stem cells, only a small amount would be localized in the brain to induce a larger, therapeutic effect. Also, since the blood brain barrier allows molecules in by diffusion based on their liposolubility, an interesting path for future research could be along the lines of trying to increase the lipid solubility of stem cells. Secondly, the question of how the adult stem cells would differentiate once in the brain could be answered upon inspection of stem cell behavior. As stated above, adult stem cells usually divide into cells in the organ in which they are found. So by snorting stem cells and allowing them to enter the brain, one might be able to trust that they divide into brain cells, right?  Well, for individuals who have damaged brain tissue from incidences such as stroke, the snorted stem cells could act as a repair mechanism in which new neural tissue could be regenerated in areas that the stem cells were localized.

Ultimately, this is just all food for thought. It can't be denied that stem cell/blood brain barrier research is still in its infancy and has vast reservoirs of untapped knowledge to be found.

Sources:
"Blood Brain Barrier and Cerebral Metabolism." Blood Brain Barrier and Cerebral Metabolism. UT Texas Medical School, n.d. Web. 30 Sept. 2014.
"Frequently Asked Questions." Stem Cell Basics: Introduction [Stem Cell Information]. National Institute of Health, n.d. Web. 29 Sept. 2014.
Morrison, Deanne. "Snorting Stem Cells." : UMNews : University of Minnesota. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Oct. 2014.

7 comments:

  1. You bring up a really good point - stem cell differentiation depends on the type of stem cell. Something you didn't mention though is the effect of the molecular environment on the differentiation of stem cells. There are a great number of molecules that influence cell differentiation, and these may be found in normal or dysfunctional brains. It seems likely to me that the type of damage or dysfunction of the brain will influence what molecules will be found in the environment; stem cells will respond to any molecules that affect differentiation so the affect of snorted stem cells may be further complicated. This article seemed to describe an interesting biomedical delivery technique, but the understanding of the physiology and possible therapeutic benefits does not seem advanced enough for the technique to be implemented in the near future.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You brought up really good points as well. I do agree that I didn't go into location based stem cell differentiation enough. I guess I was too naive in thinking that stem cells introduced into the brain would simply differentiate into the necessary brain tissue. I failed to address how complex stem cell signaling could be. You're completely right in questioning the influence of biomolecules on stem cells in the brain. Who knows if the environment of damaged brain tissue is viable enough for stem cell differentiation? It could be that the inflammatory cytokines released during cell/ tissue death could have negative effects on the stem cell.

      Delete
  2. When I was reading through your blog, I also thought that it would be beneficial to increase the lipid solubility of the stem cells. That way they could pass more easily without having to increase the permeability of the barrier. This would decrease the risk factor of having other unwanted materials passing the blood brain barrier that could have been detrimental to the patient. Another element of concern is where the other 299,500 stem cells go? I am curious if they may elicit a response else where if they are just free floating in the body.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's great! I'm glad we were on the same page. It would definitely make sense to increase lipid solubility since lipids are on of the few molecules allowed through by passive diffusion. My only question would be the extent to which lipids would affect stem cell structure. Would they still be viable? As for the other 299,500 stem cells, I would assume/hope that they were degraded safely and efficiently. To my understanding, they would be tagged and sent to lysosomes to be digested by glycosidades, proteases and lipases.

      Delete
    2. That is a good point to bring up regarding the affect that changing the composition would have. Maybe, it would be possible to attach a "carrier" to make it pass through the membrane more easily, similar to attaching a free fatty acid to albumin making it easier to travel in the blood stream. However, then it would have to be decided how to detach the stem cell to allow it to differentiate and how to remove/degrade the carrier.

      Delete
    3. That was some interesting insight! I didn't even think about using a carrier, but it would make sense that a carrier would have the least effect on the actual stem cell composition. Perhaps an enzyme would degrade the carrier? Or best case scenario, the carrier automatically releases the stem cell once in the right environment.

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete